Based on your
teaching philosophy (which may change over time), what are types of assignments
which you would include in a FYC syllabus?
Due
to my belief that teaching should always involve an interaction between
students and their instructors, rather than a time teachers devote to cramming
information down uninterested students’ throats, I believe that it is necessary
to have students engage with texts and with writing each class period. Through a variety of writing and reading
assignments and exercises, students learn to recognize their strengths and
weaknesses within their own writing, which helps them avoid making the same
mistakes in the future. I do, however,
believe that these assignments need to be carefully selected and molded to the
specific class and their abilities to perform within the discipline of composition
and rhetoric. Activities of this nature
that would prove to be the most beneficial would need to have a specific focus
and learning outcome that the student could both perceive and attain through
careful work. These assignments need to
be explained in class, with their purposes delineated (when necessary) and with
examples that might guide the students while working. I do acknowledge, in some cases, that it
might be better to avoid providing an example, as doing so might limit the
students’ potential.
A type of
assignment that would serve as a useful tool in the teaching of FYC might be,
what I’ll term, a “Verb-Identifying” assignment. Many students are not aware that strong,
active verbs are indicative of strong writing.
By providing excerpts from a persuasive piece, a critical analysis, and
a creative writing piece (say, a poem) and then having students identify the
verbs within the excerpts, the subjects of the sentence, and the tenses of the
verbs, students would understand the importance of utilizing strong, specific
verbs in their writing. This assignment
would give students the opportunity to interact directly with a variety of
different texts, and it would even be more beneficial if expanded past verb
identification and were to include transition words and phrases as well.
Another assignment
I think it would be useful for students to engage in is one in which students
are provided with samples of writing that all exhibit a range of differing tones.
They should then be asked to read the samples (which each should be 3-5 pages
in length), after which they have to state the tone that they author (or
speaker) adopts in his/her piece.
Following identification of the tone, students should be required to
identify the audience of the piece and to indicate why the tone might have been
used as it was. Students should also identify
certain rhetorical choices that the author makes in employing that specific
tone and how those choices invoke the tone.
This activity would teach students how to identify an audience within a
text, along with teaching them how to identify rhetorical choices; by focusing
closely upon these devices within a few texts, students will hopefully begin to
understand how authors employ rhetoric, which might aid them in their own
writing.
Finally, I feel
that the students should engage in some sort of writing activity a few times a
week that will allow them, following their time spent in class, to trace the
progress of their writing skills. I
think requiring two or three weekly blog posts would cause students to practice
their skills throughout the week, allowing them to continually work on the
craft. Although I do not think that the
blog prompts should be too prescriptive, I think they should set appropriate boundaries
for the students. Each should include a minimum word count of 300 words, to
ensure that students have to take the time to consider HOW they will craft a
response of that length. I also think
that each post should have a different “theme” to it. One post should be a thoughtful response to
an assigned reading that other students might benefit from reading; a second
post might be a persuasive piece, or an ad, in which students attempt to
persuade the reader of something (which the student might choose as long as it
is appropriate for the classroom). The
third blog should be open for the students to choose what genre of entry to
submit. This assignment would engage
students in writing frequently, and would allow peers to interact with less
restraints, which might work to benefit learning outcomes on a classroom,
rather than individual, level.
Trevor, interesting insight! While I absolutely agree that students learn by participating in the act of writing, I don't quite know if three 300 word blog posts a week may be a bit overwhelming for new students. As graduate students, we are currently required to write about one per week that is between 500 and 1000 words long plus two comments. I really like your comment that assignments should be moulded to a class, and I hope I haven't misread you in my assumption that you mean per the environment of a given class. I really like the idea of an adaptable syllabus. I am curious what other types of materials you would have your students look at to help develop their abilities to identify rhetorical choices?
ReplyDeleteTrevor--Yes, I found your blog post insightful, too. So, teaching should involve interaction. This is one thing we value, for the most part, especially, in all of our online courses in English; that is, we try to require synchronous components rather than only asynchronous. There's something about the synergy of a class or 1:1 interaction which can take the course content in more meaningful directions, oftentimes. Good thinking about making mistakes and capitalizing on them; this is one of the core principles of andragogy. I think the mix of creative writing, persuasion, and analysis is a good idea. I would probably move from the person to the public (from creative writing to analysis to persuasion), in terms of sequencing. Nice thinking regarding word counts; without them, students simply won't write much in most cases. Realistic insights.
ReplyDelete